检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《青岛科技大学学报(自然科学版)》2009年第4期333-336,共4页Journal of Qingdao University of Science and Technology:Natural Science Edition
基 金:重质油国家重点实验室开放课题基金资助项目(2008-08)
摘 要:现有的数据校正方法种类繁多,实际应用时难以选择合理的方法。研究了常用的多组分过程数据校正方法,如线性化法、Crowe投影矩阵法和QR正交分解法,对比分析了其原理及方法步骤,并进行了实例数据校正和性能评价。研究结果表明QR分解法精度较高,计算容易实现,因此实际应用时应首选QR分解法。There is a variety of methods available for applying data reconciliation techniques and it is quite difficult to select a proper one in actual process. In order to make the selection easier, several data reconciliation methods are studied and compared based on the theory and methods in this article, including Linearization method, Crowe's matrix projection method and QR decomposition method. An example of application is presented and the result shows that the precision of QR decomposition method is higher and the computation process is easier compared with Crowe's method and Linearization method. Therefore,QR decomposition method should be selected first for solving the hilinear data reconciliation problem.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.30