学术期刊参考文献著录规范研究盲点分析  

Some Blind Points in Descriptive Rules for Bibliographic References of Academic Journals

作　　者：周丽萍[1] 

机构地区：[1]嘉兴学院学报编辑部,浙江嘉兴314001

出　　处：《浙江海洋学院学报（人文科学版）》2009年第2期115-118,共4页Journal of Zhejiang Ocean University(Humane Science)

摘　　要：以《中华人民共和国国家标准GB/T7714-2005文后参考文献著录规则》为标准,对现行学术期刊在参考文献著录方面被研究者和使用者所忽视的问题进行了分析:第一,社会科学期刊不如自然科学期刊著录的规范程度高;第二,规范不明致使著录混乱不一;第三,电子文献著录规范过于笼统且自相矛盾。Based on GB/T7714-2005 Descriptive Rules for Content, Form and Structure of Bibliographic References, this paper analyzes some problems neglected by the researchers and users in regard to reference description for the current academic journals： firstly, natural science journals have higher standards than social science journals in descriptive rules; secondly, indefinite standards lead to confusion in description; thirdly, descriptive rules for electric references are made in a rough and self--contradictory way.

关 键 词：学术期刊 参考文献 规范 

分 类 号：G237.5[文化科学]