美国环境侵权民事司法中利益衡量的适用及对我国的启示  

Balance of Interests in U. S. Judicial Practice Relating to Environmental Torts

作　　者：王彬辉[1] 唐宇红[2] 

机构地区：[1]湖南师范大学 [2]湖南师范大学法学院

出　　处：《环球法律评论》2009年第4期61-68,共8页Global Law Review

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地武汉大学环境法研究所重大研究项目招标课题:环境法学的研究方法研究(06JJD820007)阶段性成果

摘　　要：布默诉大西洋水泥公司案的判决说明美国环境侵权民事司法中利益衡量具有独特性:广泛运用富含经济效率分析思维的利益衡量来协调个人、环境、社会和经济等多元利益;利益衡量要素趋于完善和清晰;环境侵权民事司法救济的责任形式包括完全排除侵害、部分排除侵害、代替性赔偿、损害赔偿等等。我国在处理环境污染型案件时存在法官应用利益衡量的宏观思维定位不佳、忽视经济效率分析思维的运用等问题。This article, through the analysis of the case of Boomer v. Atlantic Cement Co. , introduces the unique characteristics of the balancing of interests in U.S. judicial practice relating to environmental torts. The U. S. courts, by coordinating individual, environmental, social and economic interests through extensive application of economic efficiency analysis, have gradually clarifled the main elements in the balancing of interests comparison, Chinese judges, in balancing interests and thereby improved the relevant case law. In in cases involving environment pollution, have exhibited many shortcomings, such as inadequate orientation of macroscopic - thinking and ignoring the application of economic efficiency analysis, etc. In view of the above problems and based on the U.S. experience, the author puts forward some suggestions on improvement in this area.

关 键 词：环境侵权民事司法 利益衡量 经济效率分析思维 

分 类 号：DD912.6[政治法律—法学] D971.2