检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]青岛医学院附属医院
出 处:《山西护理杂志》1998年第4期175-176,共2页
摘 要:为检测手握试管法与常规法测定凝血时间的差异,随机选择40例门诊体检者和63例住院病人,分别采用常规水浴箱试管法和手握试管法,并进行自身对照比较。结果:两种方法测定的凝血时间无显著性差异(P>0.05)。认为手握试管法可替代水浴箱试管法进行凝血时间测定,此法易于操作,简便实用。To compare the two methods determining the blood coagulation time,40 subjects received to physical examination and 63 inpatients were randomly selected and their blood coagulation time was determined with both routine tube-water bath and hand-holding tube methods by self-controlling.Results showed no significant difference between both,suggesting the hand-holding method may take the place of routine method.The former is simple and practical.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3