苏州市生活垃圾两种处置方法的生命周期影响评价  被引量:8

Life cycle impact assessment on two disposal methods of municipal solid wastes in Suzhou

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:韦保仁[1] 王俊[1] Tahara Kiyotaka Kobayashi Kensuke Sagisaka Masayuki 

机构地区:[1]苏州科技大学环境科学与工程学院,苏州215011 [2]日本产业技术综合研究所安全科学研究部门

出  处:《环境工程学报》2009年第8期1517-1520,共4页Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering

基  金:日本环境省资助项目

摘  要:采用生命周期评价的方法,比较了苏州市垃圾填埋和垃圾焚烧2种处置方法对环境的影响。研究的系统范围主要包括垃圾收集、垃圾运输、垃圾填埋或焚烧以及发电等几个部分。采用收集的垃圾组分数据,利用IPCC推荐的模型等,计算了垃圾填埋和垃圾焚烧时CO2等气体污染物的排放量。根据对垃圾渗滤液的实测数据,计算了水污染物的排放量。环境影响评价采用日本开发的AIST-LCA Ver4计算机软件进行。计算结果表明:垃圾填埋的生态币值要大得多,可见垃圾焚烧对环境的影响比垃圾填埋的影响要小。所获得的结论较为客观地反映了对环境的影响,可以作为中国城市垃圾处置决策的参考依据。Two disposal methods, landfill and incineration, were employed for municipal solid wastes in Suzhou. The Environmental impacts of the two disposals were compared using life cycle assessment. The system boundary includes waste collect, transportation, landfill/incineration and electricity generation. Air pollutants CO2 were calculated by models with the collected data of material contents of solid wastes. Water pollutants were calculated from the measurement data of leachete. The environmental impact assessments were performed with a computer program AIST-LCA Ver4 developed in Japan. The results show that eco-index of landfill is greater than that of incineration, so that the environmental impact of incineration is smaller than landfill. The assessment results are reasonable and can be used as reference information for decision making of municipal solid waste disposal in Chinese cities.

关 键 词:生命周期影响评价 垃圾填埋 垃圾焚烧 

分 类 号:X705[环境科学与工程—环境工程]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象