检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]沙洋县农技推广中心,湖北沙洋448200 [2]湖北省农业科学院植保土肥研究所,武汉430064
出 处:《湖北农业科学》2009年第7期1571-1573,共3页Hubei Agricultural Sciences
基 金:国家粮食丰产科技工程项目(2006BAD02A02);国家科技支撑计划项目(2006BAD08A04-06;2007BAD87B09);优质稻板块生产基地建设(2007041)
摘 要:试验初步探讨了浅水晒田(A)、浅水不晒田(B)、深水晒田(C)和深水不晒田(D)4种水分管理模式对水稻病虫害的发生及产量的影响。结果表明,深水晒田(C)耗工时耗电最多,管理成本最高;深水不晒田(D)病虫害发生严重,产量最低;浅水晒田(A)水分管理方式病虫害发生较轻,产量最高。Four kinds of water management models, shallow irrigation drying field (A),shallow irrigation without drying field (B), deep irrigation drying field (C) and deep irrigation without drying field (D) ,were used to study their effects on rice diseases and insect pests occurrence and yield. The results showed that model D had the highest consumption of working hours and power with the highest management cost. Model C had the most serious diseases and insect pests and the lowest yield. Model A had the slightest diseases and insect pests and the highest yield.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15