不同水分管理模式对水稻病虫发生及产量的影响  被引量:2

Effects of Different Water Management Models on Rice Disease and Insect Pest Occurrence and Yield

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:陈小山 张舒[2] 丁寒卉 龚明华 

机构地区:[1]沙洋县农技推广中心,湖北沙洋448200 [2]湖北省农业科学院植保土肥研究所,武汉430064

出  处:《湖北农业科学》2009年第7期1571-1573,共3页Hubei Agricultural Sciences

基  金:国家粮食丰产科技工程项目(2006BAD02A02);国家科技支撑计划项目(2006BAD08A04-06;2007BAD87B09);优质稻板块生产基地建设(2007041)

摘  要:试验初步探讨了浅水晒田(A)、浅水不晒田(B)、深水晒田(C)和深水不晒田(D)4种水分管理模式对水稻病虫害的发生及产量的影响。结果表明,深水晒田(C)耗工时耗电最多,管理成本最高;深水不晒田(D)病虫害发生严重,产量最低;浅水晒田(A)水分管理方式病虫害发生较轻,产量最高。Four kinds of water management models, shallow irrigation drying field (A),shallow irrigation without drying field (B), deep irrigation drying field (C) and deep irrigation without drying field (D) ,were used to study their effects on rice diseases and insect pests occurrence and yield. The results showed that model D had the highest consumption of working hours and power with the highest management cost. Model C had the most serious diseases and insect pests and the lowest yield. Model A had the slightest diseases and insect pests and the highest yield.

关 键 词:水稻 水分管理 病虫 产量 

分 类 号:S511[农业科学—作物学] S318

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象