检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:徐凤芝[1] 王恩海[1] 秦桂英[1] 成先柄[1]
机构地区:[1]遵义医学院第一附属医院理疗科
出 处:《中华理疗杂志》1998年第4期216-217,共2页Chinese Journal of Physical Therapy
摘 要:目的:观察低频电穴位刺激对脑外伤后失语症的治疗效果。方法:选择大脑皮层参与言语整合部位在头部投射区的穴位,采用低频电刺激方法,治疗脑外伤后失语症患者24例,与同期住院常规药物治疗的34例脑外伤后失语症患者作对照,并进行疗程后的疗效比较。结果:低频电穴位治疗组平均治疗22天,痊愈率为46%,有效率为92%;药物治疗组平均治疗32.6天,痊愈率为15%,有效率为68%。两组比较,痊愈率χ2=6.82,P<0.01,差异有非常显著性;有效率χ2=4.67,P<0.05,差异有显著性。结论:低频电穴位刺激治疗的效果明显优于对照组。采用该方法治疗,可产生低频电和穴位的综合协同作用,比单一方法治疗效果明显提高。Objective:In order to search for the therapeutic effect of low frequency electrotherapy on acupoints for aphasia following brain injury.Methods:Twentyfour cases with aphasia following brain injury were treated with low frequency electrotherapy on acupoints,these acupoints were relatively connected with the speech and motor rehabilitation for the patients of aphasia or hemiplegia.Another thirtyfour aphasia cases were given the conventional drugs as a control group.The effect was compared in both groups.Results:The course of low frequency electrotherapy was 22 days averagely,the recovery and effective rate was respectively 46% and 92%.The effect of treatment group was significantly superior to that of control group(P < 0.05 , 0.01).Conclusion:It is indicated that low frequency current therapy combined with acupuncture might develop a synergic effect which was better than the single treatment for the disease.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.112