检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]成都市第六人民医院呼吸内科,成都市610051 [2]成都铁路中心医院老年科,成都市610081
出 处:《中国医院用药评价与分析》2009年第7期540-541,共2页Evaluation and Analysis of Drug-use in Hospitals of China
摘 要:目的:比较头孢哌酮与莫西沙星治疗肺部感染的疗效及其安全性。方法:共选入肺部感染住院患者120例,随机分为两组,其中应用头孢哌酮治疗60例、莫西沙星治疗60例。结果:头孢哌酮组有效率86.7%,莫西沙星组有效率93.3%;对致病菌株的清除率分别为83%和90.8%;不良反应发生率分别为5%与3.3%,两者临床疗效无明显差异(P>0.05)。结论:头孢哌酮与莫西沙星都是安全有效治疗肺部感染的药物。OBJECTIVE:To evaluate the therapeutic efficacy and adverse reactions of cefoperazone vs.moxifloxacin for pulmonary infection.METHODS:120 inpatients with pulmonary infection were randomly assigned to receive cefoperazone(n=60) or moxifloxacin(n=60).RESULTS:There were no significant differences between the cefoperazone group and the moxifloxacin group in clinical efficacy(P〉0.05)(effective rate:86.7% vs.93.3%;bacterial clearance rate:83% vs.90.8%;incidence of adverse reactions:5% vs.3.3%) CONCLUSION:Both cefoperazone and moxifloxacin are safe and effective for patients with pulmonary infection.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3