中日地理学者的论文写作年龄对比分析  

Distribution of the Age of Geographical Contributors in China and Japan

作　　者：刘云刚[1] 刘冠娜[1] 

机构地区：[1]中山大学地理科学与规划学院,广州510275

出　　处：《地理学报》2009年第8期1019-1024,共6页Acta Geographica Sinica

基　　金：国家自然科学基金项目(40701041);教育部博士点基金项目(20070558072);国家科技基础性工作专项(2007FY140800);留学回国人员科研启动基金项目~~

摘　　要：以2000年以来的《地理学报》中英文版论文为例,分析了中国地理学者的论文写作年龄特征,包括平均写作年龄、论文写作主体年龄段、高峰期年龄等等,并以日本《地理学评论》为参照,分析了体制环境因素对地理学者论文写作年龄和周期的影响。结果表明,中国地理学母语论文的写作主体是40岁左右年龄段的学者,而英文论文的写作主体是35岁左右年龄段的学者。中国地理学者的母语平均写作年龄要高于日本,但英文论文作者的平均年龄则低于日本,这种差异反映了中日两国在科研管理制度及理念上的不同。在概括分析了两者差异后提出了对中国地理学的学科发展建议。Taking the example of Acta Geographica Sinica and Journal of Geographical Sciences from 2000 to 2008, this paper analyzes the characteristics of the Chinese geographers＇ creative age, including the average age, the main groups＇ age, and the peak age. In comparison with Geographical Review of Japan, it studies the institutional factors affecting the academic age and life cycle of the researchers. We can find that in China the main group of the researchers using Chinese is about 40 years old, while that using English is 30 years old. The average age of Chinese geographers using mother tongue is higher than that of Japanese geographers, while the average age of Chinese geographers using English is lower than that of Japan. This differentiation reflects the difference in the administration and idea of academic research between China and Japan. Based on the discussion of the difference, some suggestions are given to the academic construction of geography in China.

关 键 词：论文写作年龄 写作高峰期 地理学报 地理学评论 中国 日本 

分 类 号：P90[天文地球—自然地理学]