检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:欧福永[1]
出 处:《时代法学》2009年第4期86-92,共7页Presentday Law Science
基 金:湖南省社会科学基金项目"若干国家现行国际民商事争议解决机制研究"(05ZC15)成果之一
摘 要:禁诉令是中国香港法院用于解决它与内地法院民商事管辖权积极冲突的方法。在First Laser Ltd.案和LWS v.TNN案中,香港法院都讨论了是否签发禁诉令来禁止当事人继续进行在内地的诉讼。这两个案例较全面地揭示了香港法院审查针对内地诉讼的禁诉令申请时所遵循的法律原则以及签发禁诉令需满足的条件。禁诉令在保护我国内地的民商事管辖权和重要公共政策方面亦具有积极意义,内地可采纳该制度,对禁诉令的概念、签发条件和运用时的注意事项以及制裁措施等作出规定。The anti-suit injunction is used by Hong Kong courts to solve the Civil and Commercial Jurisdictional Positive Conflicts between Chinese Mainland and Hong Kong. Hong Kong courts discussed the issuing of an anti-suit injunction in the case of First Laser Ltd. and the case of LWS v. TNN. The above cases reveal the legal principles used by Hong Kong courts examining the antisuit injunction against Chinese Mainland and the requirements that should be met before issuing the anti-suit injunction. The anti-suit injunction has positive function in protecting the jurisdiction of Chinese Mainland, so Chinese Mainland may adopt this injunction, and lay down some provisions on its concept, issuing condition, point of attention and the punishment measures.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222