检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]青岛大学医学院附属医院海阳分院妇产科,山东海阳265100 [2]青岛大学医学院附属医院妇产科,山东青岛266003
出 处:《中国现代医学杂志》2009年第13期1982-1985,共4页China Journal of Modern Medicine
摘 要:目的探讨单叶产钳、双叶产钳和胎头吸引术在剖宫产术中的应用。方法对160例剖宫产术中出头困难的胎儿分别应用单叶产钳、双叶产钳和胎头吸引术娩出胎儿,比较3种方法的利弊。结果与单叶产钳组和双叶产钳组比较,胎头吸引器组新生儿损伤小,产妇并发症少(P<0.05)。结论在剖宫产中应用胎头吸引术比产钳更安全、省力且操作简单,值得在临床上推广使用。[Objective] To demonstrate investigate application of simple and double leaf forceps and vacuum extraction in cesarean delivery. [Methods] Investigated 160 pregnant women delivered by vacuum extraction or obstetric forceps in cesarean delivery during 2006 to 2007, appraise the advantages and disadvantages of assisted cesarean delivery by forceps and vacuum extraction. [Results] Compared with simple and double leaf Forceps, there were significant differences in injury to the baby and puerpera injuries in using vacuum extraction of cesarean delivery (P〈0.05). [Conclusions] Vacuum extraction is a safe, convenient and feasible, perspective valuable method in cesarean delivery.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.30