两种氧气雾化吸入器用于高龄COPD患者效果观察  

Observation of the Effects of Application of Two Kinds of Oxygen Atomization Inhaler in Senior Patients with COPD

作　　者：高萌[1] 霍霞[1] 张立华[1] 卢丽华[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国人民解放军总医院南楼心血管一科,北京100853

出　　处：《护理学报》2009年第12期58-60,共3页Journal of Nursing（China）

摘　　要：目的探讨两种氧气雾化吸入器应用于高龄慢性阻塞性肺疾病(chronic obstructive pulmonary disease,COPD)患者的效果。方法将104例76～104岁的高龄COPD患者分为面罩组(n=48)和喷嘴组(n=56),分别使用面罩氧气雾化器和口含喷嘴氧气雾化器进行氧气雾化吸入,比较两组治疗前后和治疗中生命体征、SpO2、吸入过程配合和不良反应、症状缓解等方面情况。结果两组患者完成吸入治疗后,面罩组患者SpO2高于喷嘴组(P<0.05);与喷嘴组相比,面罩组患者对正确吸入方法的掌握度较好,症状缓解率更高(P<0.05);两组患者吸入过程不良反应发生情况差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论面罩氧气雾化吸入方式由于吸入方法容易掌握,有利于症状缓解,因此更适合高龄COPD患者。Objective To explore the effects of application of two kinds of oxygen atomization inhaler in senior patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease （COPD）. Methods In this study, elderly patients aged between 76 and 104 with COPD were divided into the mask group （n=48） and the nozzle group （n=56）, the former offered the mask oxygen nebulizer and the latter, the nozzle oxygen nebulizer for the oxygen inhalation. Then a comparison was made of the vital signs, SpO2, while-inhalation cooperation and adverse reactions, and alleviation of the symptoms of the two groups. Results After the inhalation, the SpO2 of the mask group was higher than that of the nozzle group （P〈0.05）. The mask group displayed a better inhalation and had a higher rate of symptom alleviation （P〈0.05）. And the differences in the incidences of while-inhalation adverse reactions between the two groups were not statistically significant （P〉0.05）. Conclusion Mask oxygen atomization inhalation, easier to grasp, is more conducive to symptom alleviation and is more suitable for senior patients with COPD.

关 键 词：高龄 慢性阻塞性肺疾病 雾化吸入 面罩型氧气雾化器 喷嘴型氧气雾化器 

分 类 号：R563[医药卫生—呼吸系统]