健康状况测评问卷的编制及信效度检验  

Preparation, reliability and validity of health status questionnaire

作　　者：田京发[1] 潘立 王晓敏[1] 

机构地区：[1]解放军总医院第一附属医院体检中心,北京100037 [2]亿阳集团股份有限公司健康事业部

出　　处：《中华健康管理学杂志》2009年第4期216-218,共3页Chinese Journal of Health Management

摘　　要：目的编制一套符合健康管理需求、适用于不同体检人群的综合调查问卷。方法通过文献分析和临床经验总结，从睡眠、疼痛、焦虑、抑郁、压力、疲劳、生活习惯及社会适应8方面评价体检者的健康状况。参考国内外较为成熟的量表建立条目库，对条目进行筛选，建构健康状况测评问卷。分层随机抽取2866名受检者进行正式测试，对测试结果进行信效度检验。结果健康状况测评问卷各条目与总分的相关系数在0．361～0．683之间，分量表的Cronbach’α均不低于0．945，复测信度系数均不低于0．677，分半信度系数不低于0．835，探索性因素分析得到8个因子共解释总变异的69．37％，验证性因素分析的结果拟合度较好。结论健康状况测评问卷具有较高的信度和效度，适用于健康管理中受检者的信息采集。Objective To develop a set of health status questionnaire in line with health management demands for different physical examination receivers. Methods Based on literature review and clinical practice, sleep, pain, anxiety, depression, stress, fatigue, habits and social adaptation could be used as health items. An item database was set according to domestic or abroad established questionnaires. The items were screened to constitute our health status questionnaire. A total of 2866 individuals were randomly chosen to get the reliability or validity test. Results The correlation coefficient of single item with total score was 0. 361-0.683. The Cronbach＇ ot of sub-scales was ≥0.945, the retested reliability coefficient of was ≥0. 677, and split-half reliability coefficient was ≥0. 835. Eight factors in exploratory factor analysis explained 69. 37% of total variance. Confirmatory factor analysis showed high degree of fitting. Conclusion Our health status questionnaire has higher reliability and validity and can be used for health data collection.

关 键 词：健康调查 评价研究 信度 效度 

分 类 号：R19[医药卫生—卫生事业管理]