检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]南京大学大气科学学院,江苏南京210093 [2]淮河流域气象中心,安徽蚌埠233000
出 处:《安徽农业科学》2009年第24期11637-11640,共4页Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences
基 金:淮河流域气象开放研究基金(HRM200708)
摘 要:利用2007年7月淮河流域常规站、自动雨量站和自动气象站逐日降雨资料,选取不同的方法,计算淮河流域15个子单元的面雨量实况,并对结果进行了对比分析。结果表明:所采取的泰森多边形法和算术平均法计算结果相差不大。同时,将自动气象站、自动雨量站以及常规站点进行合成,用合成后的站点雨量计算的面雨量与常规站计算结果进行对比,进一步分析站点密度及站点分布对流域面雨量计算的影响,结果表明不同雨量资料的计算结果存在差别。Based on the daily rainfall data of Conventional Weather Station,Automatic Rainfall Station, and Automatic Weather Station in Huaihe River Basin in July 2007 ,area rainfall of 15 sub-units in Huaihe River Basin were calculated, and made a comparative analysis of their corre- sponding results. The results showed that it was little difference between two methods. Meanwhile, Auto Weather Station, Automatic Rainfall Station as well as Conventional Weather Station were synthesized into a new rainfall data. Then the area rainfall was calculated by the new rainfall data and compared with the area rainfall by conventional weather station data. Effects of density and distribution of the station on calculating the area rainfall in Huaihe River Basin were analyzed. It turned out that there is a significant difference of the calculating results using different rainfall data.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28