韦氏记忆测验、临床记忆量表在颅脑损伤后伤残鉴定的应用情况分析  

A Comparison of Performances Between Wechsler Memory Scale and Clinical Memory Scale in Traumatic Brain Injured Patients

作　　者：丁树明[1] 高北陵[1] 蔡敏英[1] 李映萍[1] 盛璐[1] 

机构地区：[1]深圳市康宁医院法医精神病司法鉴定所,广东深圳518020

出　　处：《中国临床心理学杂志》2009年第4期457-458,470,共3页Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology

基　　金：深圳市科技计划基金资助项目(200802084)

摘　　要：目的:比较韦氏记忆测验和临床记忆量表在颅脑损伤患者的应用情况,探讨在该类患者的适用性。方法:对206例颅脑损伤恢复期患者作韦氏记忆测验、300例作临床记忆量表检测,并完成临床实际记忆损伤评估,对照分析结果。结果:①两个量表间记忆商数存在显著差异;②两个量表所得记忆商数都与临床实际评定存在较多不一致,韦氏记忆测验更明显。结论:①在正常或较轻的颅脑损伤后记忆损伤患者,两个量表有相似的检测结论,但在记忆损伤较严重的患者,临床记忆量表有更好的适用性;②不能仅依据测量工具的记忆商数,而要结合其它资料才能更准确地评估记忆功能状况。Objective： To compare performances of Wechsler Memory Scale（WMS） and Clinical Memory Scale（CMS）,to explore applicability of WMS and CMS in the different degree traumatic brain injured patients. Methods： 206 patients were tested with WMS and 300 with CMS, and completed clinical diagnosis for all, to compare the performances. Results： （1）There was no significant differences in the MQ between the two groups in the normal,marginal memory impairment, there were significant differences in the mild memory impairment. （2）There were remarkable variance between the MQ and the clinical diagnosis, WMS was even more variant. Conclusion： （1）There is similar outcome between WMS and CMS in the patients with normal,marginal memory impairment, CMS shows more applicable in the patients with more severe mem- ory impairment. （2）It is not correct to diagnose memory defect degree with MQ without more clinical information.

关 键 词：韦氏记忆测验 临床记忆量表 颅脑损伤 

分 类 号：R395.1[哲学宗教—心理学]