恩格斯的公式具有怎样的哲学视域——驳阿尔都塞对“历史合力论”的批评  

Vision in Engels’ Creed:A Reply to a Censure of Althusser

作　　者：张文喜[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国人民大学哲学院马克思主义哲学与当代世界问题研究中心,北京100872

出　　处：《学术月刊》2009年第8期44-51,共8页Academic Monthly

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目"重建历史唯物主义历史总体观"(批准号:08BZX074)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：恩格斯的"历史合力论"对意志的解释,主要服务于具体的历史实践解释,因而采用对经济主义批判的解释形式。这里面包含了双重意义,一方面是制定摆脱唯意志论的大纲,另一方面则表明作用于社会规则(规律)的意志来源。"历史合力论"意味着达到并深入于个人历史作用之真理的具体性,而不是坚执那种将人的意志、目的当作原因之抽象的理智观念。但是,阿尔都塞不仅没有坚持这种逻辑关系,反而将它当作意识形态来分析。恩格斯原本用于意志来源的反思上的理论,被阿尔都塞误当作用在对意志目的的思考上。是阿尔都塞而不是恩格斯混淆了真正的历史因果关系。Engels＇ explaintion to will of historical joint efforts theory is mainly used for historic practical explaination and it is critical explaination to ecnomism. It has double meaning, one is to draw up an outline for breaking with voluntarism and the other is to show the volitional source of social rules. This historical joint efforts theory means that what it has won was not the nonobjective intellectual intuition which takes will as the reason but the embodiment which achieves the truth of individual historical effect. Althusser did not insist on this logical relation, but analyzed it as ideology. Engels＇ reflective theory of will source was misused on will purpose. It is Althusser but not Engels confused the real historic causality.

关 键 词：恩格斯 阿尔都塞 历史合力论 意志 

分 类 号：A811[哲学宗教—马克思主义哲学] B565.59