“革命权”与“普选权”——国际社会主义运动的双重历史选择与“两难”实践课题  

"Right of Revolution" and "Universal Suffrage"——The Dual Historical Choice of the International Socialist Movement of and the "Dilemma" Practical Issues

作　　者：姜中才[1] 石雪荣[1] 

机构地区：[1]大连大学,辽宁大连116622

出　　处：《陇东学院学报》2009年第4期63-65,共3页Journal of Longdong University

摘　　要："革命权"与"普选权",既是国际社会主义运动的双重历史选择,又是科学社会主义创始人根据国际社会主义运动的"两难"实践留给其后来者的一个遗嘱性的两难课题。在这一课题的破解过程中,至20世纪初,社会主义运动分化成不共戴天的两大主流运动,即科学社会主义运动和民主社会主义运动。"科学"有"科学"的根据,"民主"有"民主"的道理,不存在谁吃掉谁、谁演变谁的问题。时至当代新自由主义必欲主导全球化而又酿成全球性金融危机的情势下,二者应求同存异和而不同,互为模式相互借鉴。The ＂right of revolution＂ and ＂universal suffrage＂, international socialist movement, but also a dilemma subject of their are not only the double historical choice of the subsequent probate left by the founder of scientific socialism in accordance with the ＂ dilemma＂, the practice of the international socialist movement. In the process of breaking the subject, till the early 20th century, the socialist movement was differentiated into two main movements, that is, the Scientific Socialist Movement and the Democratic Socialist Movement. ＂ Science＂ has its own scientific basis, and ＂ democracy＂ has its own reasonable sense to be of ＂ democracy＂. There are no such problems as who wilt eat who and who evolved who. Up to now, in the background that the neo -liberalism will be bound to result in the globalization and it has led to the global financial crisis, they should seek the common ground while reserving differences, offer models with each other and learn from each other.

关 键 词：革命权 普选权 双重历史选择 

分 类 号：D0[政治法律—政治学]