检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:孙瑞华[1] 高新华[1] 齐松仁[1] 关丽征[2]
机构地区:[1]中日友好医院科研处,北京100029 [2]首都医科大学管理学院,北京100069
出 处:《中华医学科研管理杂志》2009年第4期211-213,240,共4页Chinese Journal of Medical Science Research Management
基 金:北京市首都医学发展科研基金资助项目(2005-1037)
摘 要:目的探讨首都医学发展科研基金立项指标体系的基本构成及其合理性,为进一步建立和完善首都医学发展科研基金立项评估指标体系提供实践和理论基础。方法采用问卷调查方式对北京市33名医院科研管理人员进行调查,采用分半信度、克朗巴赫α系数进行问卷信度评价,采用内容效度和结构效度进行问卷效度考评。结果被调查者对一、二级指标的认可度均在87.88%以上;指标体系的分半信度为0.7933;克朗巴赫。系数为0.9103,内部一致性信度较高;二级指标因子分析共提取4个公因子,累积贡献率达到78.44%。结论首都医学发展科研基金立项指标体系基本构成合理可行,为进一步研究奠定了基础。Objective To evaluate the reasonability and feasibility of evaluation index system for the Capital Research Fund for Medical Development in order to provide some preliminary practical and theo- retical fundamentals for setting up and improving an evaluation index system for the Capital Research Foundation for Medical Development. Methods Based on the investigation of thirty three hospital's administrators in Beijing,we used statistical methods to evaluate the reliability and validity of the evaluation index system. Results The first grade and second grade index were approved by more than 87.88% responders;the half-reliability of the evaluation index system was 0.7933 and the Cronbach's alpha coefficient is 0. 9103, the factor analysis of the second grade indicators showed that there were four factors extracted, and the accumulative variance reached 78.44%. Conclusion The evaluation index system for the Capital Research Fund for Medical Development is reasonable and feasible,and the research result will provide a basis for fur ther study.
关 键 词:首都医学发展科研基金 指标体系 立项评价
分 类 号:R197.323.6[医药卫生—卫生事业管理]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117