检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]暨南大学经济学院 [2]中国工商银行广东省分行,广东广州510100
出 处:《财会通讯(下)》2009年第8期39-42,161,共4页Communication of Finance and Accounting
摘 要:本文采用三种不同的标准衡量我国承销商声誉,运用我国A股发行市场的数据分别从企业财务指标、承销IPO的风险和IPO长期回报这三个方面,对承销商声誉与发行企业质量之间的关系进行了实证分析。结果发现:理论上得出的承销商声誉与IPO企业质量之间的正相关关系在我国并不存在,说明投资者通过承销商声誉等级来区分发行企业质量的"信号甄别机制"在我国证券发行市场基本不存在,我国承销商的信息生产功能和认证中介职能严重缺位。This article give three ways to measure underwriters reputation,and give positive analysis to the relation between underwriter reputation and the quality of issuing firms from the aspects of finance index,the risk of underwriting IPO and the long-run performance of IPO.The result shows that there is no positive relationship between underwriter reputation and the quality of issuying firms which is proved theorically.This conclution relies that the'signal selection mechanism',which shows investor measure the quality of issuing firms by the ranks of underwriter reputation,does not exist in our IPOs market;this solution also relies the our underwritors'function of Information producton and certification intermediation is lost.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117