检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:彭美[1]
出 处:《东南大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2009年第4期78-82,共5页Journal of Southeast University(Philosophy and Social Science)
摘 要:法院工作报告制度萌芽于陕甘宁边区政府的民主实践,建国初期在最高人民法院试行取得良好效果的前提下,被1954年宪法正式确立为一项法院组织制度。然而,1982年宪法取消了法院工作报告制度,致使该制度面临缺失宪法依据的困境。虽然法院工作报告制度赖以产生的基础在当代发生缺失或变化,但法院工作报告制度未来可以通过强化其监督功能、取消人大代表对法院工作报告的投票环节途径寻求发展空间。Sprouting in the democratic practice of Shanxi-Gansu-Ningxia Border Region,and approved in the trial implementation of the Supreme People's Court in the early period after 1949,the court report system was established as a court organizational system by China's constitutional law in 1954.However,with the abolishment of this system in 1982,it is in the dilemma of lacking constitutional foundation.Although the basis of this system has changed or even disappeared,it is still possible for this report system to play its role by strengthening its supervisory function and by abolishing the procedure of NPC members' voting on court report.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.91