检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李强[1] 吴耀禄[2] 郭峰[2] 梅乐园[2] 白忠学[2]
机构地区:[1]延安市人民医院普外科,716000 [2]延安大学附属医院普外科
出 处:《当代医学》2009年第25期55-56,共2页Contemporary Medicine
摘 要:目的探讨失血性休克高渗盐水早期限制性液体复苏的临床意义。方法分析70例未控制失血性休克的液体复苏方法,比较常规液体组(n=36)与高渗盐限制性液体复苏组(n=34)两种方法的治愈率、死亡率及MODS发生率。结果常规组输液量(3080±504)ml,治愈率72.2%、死亡率27.8%,MODS发生率36.1%;高渗盐水组输液量(1013±320)ml,治愈率91.2%、死亡率8.8%,MODS发生率13.9%,两组间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论高渗盐水早期限制性液体复苏可提高治愈率,降低MODS发生率。Objective To investigate the clinical meaning of fluid resuscitation with hypertonic saline in treatment of hemorrhagic shock. methods 70 patients were analyzed and compared cure rate,mortality rate and incidence of MODS between regular fluid resuscitation group(n=36) and hypertonic saline group(n=34). Results Average transfusion quantities of regular fluid resuscitation group were(3080±504)ml. Cure rate was 72.2%,mortality rate was27.8%, incidence of MODS was 36.1%. Average transfusion quantities of limited fluid resuscitation group were(1013±320) ml. Cure rate was91.2 %, mortality rate was 8.8%, incidence of MODS was 13.9%. here was statistically significant different of survival rate, mortality rate and MODS rate between the two groups (P〈0.05). Conclusion Limited fluid resuscitation with hypertonic saline treatment on hemorrhagic shock can improve cure rate reduce the incidence of DODS.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.21.114.165