检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:钟德文
机构地区:[1]四川省凉山州雷波县疾病预防控制中心流行病科,616550
出 处:《当代医学》2009年第25期158-158,11,共2页Contemporary Medicine
摘 要:目的对三种不同浓度呋喃丹灭蝇纸灭蝇试验的效果进行分析,为试制灭蝇纸提供科学依据。方法将制作好的灭蝇纸浸湿放于盘内进行灭蝇效果试验,结果用方差分析法处理。结果3.33‰和2.12‰的灭蝇纸,两者间无显著性差异(P>0.05),而与对照组2‰灭蝇纸比较(F=19.94>F=0.01(6.35)有极显著性差异(P<0.01)。结论3.33‰和2.2‰乙组灭蝇纸浓度的灭蝇效果是相同的,说明灭蝇纸的有效浓度不能低于2.2‰。Objective To analysis the effect of three kind of different density paper of eradicating musca, and provide the scientific basis to trial production of paper of eradicating musca.Methods Paper of eradicating musca were soaked into the plate and carried on effect experiment of eradicating nausea, the result were processedwith the variance analytic method. Results there was no significant difference between 3.33‰ and 2.12‰ paper of eradicating musca(P〉0.05), but had signigicant difference compared with control group[F=19.94〉F=0.01 (6.35) P〈0.01], Conclusion 3.33‰ and 2.2‰ paper oferad/cating musca has the same effect on eradicating musca, this show that the concentration of paper of eradicating musca should be not lower than 2.2‰.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.235