关于土地补偿款村级留存问题的法律思考  

Thinking of the Problem of Compensation Proportion for the Collective-owned Land in the Village

作　　者：崔艺红[1] 

机构地区：[1]西安财经学院法学系,陕西西安710061

出　　处：《贵州大学学报（社会科学版）》2009年第4期93-96,共4页Journal of Guizhou University(Social Sciences)

基　　金：国家社科基金项目<农村土地纠纷的多元化解决机制与构建和谐社会--来自西部地区的实证研究>(项目编号:07BFX007);陕西省教育厅专项基金项目<农地征收中村民;村级组织及乡镇政府之间的利益博弈及其法律调控>(项目编号:07JK049)的阶段性研究成果

摘　　要：土地补偿款依法归农村集体经济组织所有,其村级留存比例反映了集体经济组织与村民之间土地补偿款分配的利益博弈,这场利益博弈的本质是村民的个人利益与集体利益、眼前利益与长远利益之间的矛盾问题。实践中,许多地方的村民利用"一事一议"的优势制度安排,以村民(代表)大会决议的法律形式否定村集体对土地补偿款的留存权,将土地补偿款"分光花净",导致集体经济实力不断弱化,服务村民的职能日益衰弱,以至于在严重的旱灾面前,丧失了组织乡村抗旱的基本功能。文章针对问题的成因分析,提出了解决土地补偿款村级留存问题的法律对策。The compensation for the collective-owned land belongs to the collective economic organization. And the proportion of compensation kept by the village reflects the benefits of the compensation between the collective economic organization and the farmers. The essence of the conflict is the contradiction between the farmers themselves and the collective economic organization. In practice, some farmers in the village decided to distribute all the compensation among themselves in line with the regulation of “one discussion for one specific thing” in order to deprive the collective economic organization of all the compensation and consume it up. This kind of practice has made the collective economy so weak that the organization could not serve the villagers well. It has even lost the basic power to combat a drought when it comes. This article gives some meaningful advice on how to solve this kind of problem after analyzing some reasons for it.

关 键 词：土地补偿款 村级留存 博弈 

分 类 号：D922.32[政治法律—法学]