历史与现实的平衡:晚清水权纠纷的审理  

The balance of history and reality:the trial of water right dispute in the late Qing Dynasty

作　　者：田东奎[1] 

机构地区：[1]宝鸡文理学院政法系,陕西宝鸡721013

出　　处：《西北大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2009年第5期116-121,共6页Journal of Northwest University：Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition

基　　金：国家社科基金项目(07XFX007);陕西省教育厅基金项目(06JK143)

摘　　要：运用法社会学方法,依据档案资料,研究晚清水权纠纷民事审理的概况。晚清水权纠纷的审理具有制度转型时期的司法特征:一方面,适用清代水权法律制度,维护原水权人的利益;另一方面,运用新的水权观念,对水权变化作出符合时代要求的安排。晚清水权审理的主角是州县衙门,方式以调解为主,审理原则兼顾历史与现实的平衡;判决因法官个人修养、水权观念不同,结果差异较大;判决执行分为水权秩序的重建与勒石刻碑对判决内容的确认。研究晚清水权纠纷的民事审理,对于合理利用水资源,减少水权纠纷具有重要的现实意义。Social law was totally applied to discuss the the hearing of water right disputes during Ming and Wing Dynasty according to the historial ducuments and archives. The hearing of water rights dispute in the later Qing dynasty has the features of transforming judicature system. That is, on the one hand, the application of the legal system of water rights was applied in the Qing Dynasty to maintain the right to the interests of the people;on the other hand, the use of the new concept of water rights was in line with changes of the requirements of the times. The main body of trial water rights dispute is the counties＇ government offices, which take the ways of mediation based on the principle of balance of history and reality. The decision is a greater difference as a result of Judge＇s personal self - cultivation and their ideas of water rights concepts. The enforcement of judgments is divided into two parts in which the one is the reconstruction of the water rights order and the other is that to make the contents of decision of the stone. The study would make us realize the improtant value of rational use of water resources.

关 键 词：晚清 水权 审理 

分 类 号：D929[政治法律—法学]