历史法学派之借鉴与中国民法典制定之反思  

Drawing Reference to History School and o Rethinking China's Codification of Civil Legal System

作　　者：翟寅生[1] 陈罗兰[2] 

机构地区：[1]清华大学法学院,北京100084 [2]华东政法大学研究生院,上海200042

出　　处：《西部法学评论》2009年第4期30-36,共7页Western Law Review

摘　　要：在中国已进入大规模立法的今天,我们面临着法典化的强烈呼求,但也同时面临着法学发展的不完全与城乡二元的对立等障碍,如何应对这种矛盾,换言之,我们现在法典化是否过于仓促,就成了摆在整个转型期中国法学与立法者面前的、不可绕开的难题。200年前的德国,面对着四分五裂的各邦也同样有着这样的争论,其中最有影响的萨维尼与蒂博的论战,这场论争以萨维尼的反对仓促法典化的主张胜利告终,其立足点主要在于民族精神的尚未完成与法学发展的不完善。那么中国今天的大规模的立法,尤其是法典化运动,对此应该有所借鉴。With the trend of codification and massive legislation of China＇s civil legal system, we＇re confronted with various problems, including but not limited to, the low level of China＇s legal studies and the antagonism between urban and rural areas＂ recognition of law. Therefore, it becomes an inevitable step to resolve the contradiction before putting the codification of civil law on the agenda. Two hundreds years ago, facing a disrupted nation, Germany had the same discussions as we do today, among which the most worth mentioning is the debate between Savigny and Thibaut. At last the famous debate ended with the victory of Savigny, who opposed to codification in that time for the reason that the legal studies and other conditions were not well prepared. Then, China＇s legislations today, esp. codification of civil law, may have to learn something from them.

关 键 词：历史法学派 萨维尼 民族精神 法典化 中国民法典 

分 类 号：D923[政治法律—民商法学]