检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中国.山西医科大学医学心理学教研室,太原市030001
出 处:《中国健康心理学杂志》2009年第7期872-874,共3页China Journal of Health Psychology
摘 要:目的对Fennell认知问卷(CQ)进行中文修订,并考察其信度和效度。方法在完成问卷修订和预备测试的基础上,选取600名大学生进行了CQ和Beck抑郁量表(BDI)的测试,其中150名学生2周后参加了复测。分析中文修订版问卷的信、效度。结果问卷的内部一致性信度和重测信度比较理想,修订版的CQ总体信度达到0.80,验证性因素分析支持CQ的5维度模型,且构成各维度的题目也同原版问卷相同。结论该CQ中文修订版具有较高的信度和效度,可以作为大学生认知风格的测量工具。Objective To revise Fennell Cognitions Questionnaire (CQ) and examine its r-eliability and validity. Methods Based on finishing the recension, as vcell as the preparation test, 600 university students were measured with Cognitions Question- naire (CQ) and B--eck Depression Inventory (BDI), and 150 students of them participated the retest after two weeks. Then we analyzed its reliability and validity. Results The internal consistency reliability and the retest reliability of the questionnaire was satisfactory. The total alpha coefficient got at 0. 80. Confirmatory factor analysis verified five dimension models of the CQ, and the items of each dimension were as same as the original version. Conclusion The revised Chinese Version of the Cognitions Questionnaire (CQ) has good reliability and validity,which can be applied in research for cognitive style of university students.
分 类 号:R395.1[哲学宗教—心理学] R445.2[医药卫生—医学心理学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.25