徘徊于传统与突破之间的尴尬——评《最高人民法院关于审理民事案件适用诉讼时效制度若干问题的规定》  

On the Embarrassment of Hanging back between Tradition and Innovation

作　　者：胡兴元[1] 

机构地区：[1]安徽警官职业学院,安徽合肥230031

出　　处：《安徽警官职业学院学报》2009年第3期26-28,43,共4页Journal of Anhui Vocational College of Police Officers

摘　　要：《民法通则》关于诉讼时效的规定,因其时代的局限性和制度自身的不合理性而遭致理论界和实务界诟病已久。《最高人民法院关于审理民事案件适用诉讼时效制度若干问题的规定》虽然在一定程度上弥补了《民法通则》对此规定的不足,但囿于司法解释的效力阶位,依然无法修正这一制度本身的不合理性。基于我国的立法传统和客观现实的需求,司法解释在我国法律体系中的地位,则是徘徊于传统和突破之间的尴尬。As to the limitation of action of The General Principles of Civil Law, because of its own limitation and system itself, it has been theoretically and practically questioned for a long time. Though The Related Regulations that the Supreme People＇s Court can Apply the Limitation of Action on the Trial of Civil Cases has made up for its shortage to a certain extent, owing to the judicial interpretation, it still cannot be corrected reasonably. Based on our country＇s legislative tradition and objective reality, the judicial interpretation on the demand of the Chinese legal system is hovering the embarrassment between tradition and innovation.

关 键 词：诉讼时效 权利 请求权 债权 诉讼时效中断 

分 类 号：D923[政治法律—民商法学] D922.181[政治法律—法学]