检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:邢长英[1] 滕银成[1] 童剑倩[1] 陆丽华[1]
机构地区:[1]上海交通大学附属第六人民医院,上海200233
出 处:《实用妇产科杂志》2009年第9期555-557,共3页Journal of Practical Obstetrics and Gynecology
摘 要:目的:探讨改良腹腔镜筋膜内子宫切除术(CISH)的手术方法和临床效果。方法:回顾性分析201例改良CISH(研究组)及35例传统CISH(对照组)的临床资料及随访结果。结果:①两组中转开腹率均为3%。②研究组手术时间85.36±32.24分钟,少于对照组100.56±29.94分钟(P<0.05);研究组术中出血量50.62±44.23ml,少于对照组83.36±29.21ml(P<0.05);研究组术后排气时间22.29±3.42小时,短于对照组38.36±9.34小时(P<0.05);两组术后阴道流血时间、残端出血率及术后病率之间比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。③术后随访,研究组残留宫颈类似正常外观,对照组宫颈成实性组织。结论:改良腹腔镜筋膜内子宫切除术安全、可靠,具有术中出血少、手术时间短、术后恢复快并且术后有利于进行常规检查,发现病变等优点。Objective: To explore the technical aspects and advantages of a newly intrafascial supracervical hysterectomy (CISH) in laparoscopic hysterectomy. Methods:We performed a retrospective evaluation of 201 women who underwent a new CISH (the study group) and 35 women (the control group) who did conventional CISH technique. Results:The rate transfer to transabdominal hysterectomy was 3% in two groups as severely pelvic adhesions. The women who underwent the new CISH had significantly shorter operating time (85.36±32.24 min) as compared to the conventional method (100.56±29.94 min). The intraoperative blood loss of study group were 50.62±44.23 ml, shorter than control group (83.36 ± 29.21 ml) ( P 〈 0.05) ; and the anus venting time of study group were 22.29 ±3.42 hr, lower than that of the control group (38.36±9.34 hr) ( P〈0.05). There was no significant difference in the postoperative bleeding time, the postoperative blood loss, and postoperative fever rate between two groups. Conclusions:Tbe new CISH technique is safer, more convenient, faster, and less blood loss than the conventional technique.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.200