论应急行政行为的法律规制  

On Legal Regulation of Emergency Responsing Administrative Action

作　　者：代正群[1] 

机构地区：[1]湖南文理学院法学院,湖南常德415000

出　　处：《中南大学学报（社会科学版）》2009年第4期518-522,共5页Journal of Central South University：Social Sciences

摘　　要：效率与正义是应急行政行为在实施过程中不可偏废的两个方面,虽然应对突发事件的客观需要决定了个体的权利保障要服从于代表公益的效率要求,但效率优先是相对的,权利保障是必须的。基于权利保障的要求和法治的追求,必须对应急行政行为进行规制。规制的法律途径主要有三种:规则控制、程序控制、诉讼控制。为实现三种控制方式综合作用的最佳效果,应进一步加强我国应急法制体系建设,尽快出台行政程序法,明确应急行政行为司法审查制度。Efficiency and justice are equally important and neither of then can be neglected in implementation of emergency responsing administrative action. Though the objective need of coping with emergency decides that guarantee of personal rights should obey requirement of efficiency, which represents public welfare, efficiency is relative, and right guarantee is the principle which must be followed. Based on the requirement of both guarantee of rights and rule of law, approaches, namely emergency responsing administrative action must be controlled. There are three legal regulation approach： rules control, procedural control, and litigation control. To realize the best effect of the three-approach comprehensive action, emergency responsing legal and should strengthen construction further, administrative procedure law should be promulgated as soon as possible, the judicial review system of administrative action should be established.

关 键 词：应急行政行为 规则控制 程序控制 诉讼控制 法治 

分 类 号：DF3[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]