检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陶丽[1]
机构地区:[1]安徽医科大学第一附属医院妇产科,安徽省合肥230022
出 处:《中国基层医药》2009年第8期1398-1399,共2页Chinese Journal of Primary Medicine and Pharmacy
摘 要:目的探讨瘢痕子宫对孕产妇及围生儿结局的影响。方法回顾性分析妊娠超过28周的瘢痕子宫孕妇252例,根据不同的分娩方式对母婴结局进行分析。结果阴道分娩32例(12.7%),再次剖宫产220例(87.3%);阴道分娩组和剖宫产组的孕周及新生儿出生体质量差异有统计学意义,两组新生儿低Apgar评分和产妇产后出血及产褥病率发生率差异元统计学意义。结论选择合适的剖宫产术后再妊娠的产妇,在严密的监护下阴道试产是安全的,再次剖宫产也相对安全。Objective To investigate the effects of scarred uterus on maternal and neonatal outcomes. Methods Based on the delivery mode,252 repregnant women in their third trimester after cesarean section were retrospectively reviewed and divided into two groups. Results The rate of vaginal delivery is 12.7% while the rate of the cesarean delivery is 87. 3%. There are significant differences on gestational weeks and neanatal's birth-weight, however no significant differences on the Apgar, postpartum hemorrhage and puerperal morbidity between the two groups. Conclusion Vaginal delivery after previous cesarean section (s) is safe and so is the recurrent cesarean section after failed induction if there are proper patient selection and close monitoring.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222