国家法失效研究的一个理论架构——以类型化为中心  

A Theoretical Framework on the Failure of National Law——To Centre on the Type

作　　者：吴国喆[1] 

机构地区：[1]西北师范大学政法学院,甘肃兰州730070

出　　处：《西北师大学报（社会科学版）》2009年第5期90-95,共6页Journal of Northwest Normal University(Social Sciences)

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目"民法中不确定概念的具体化研究"(09BFX026)

摘　　要：法的失效可以在不同层面、不同意义上存在,因此必须对此予以限缩才能形成相对确定的结论,法的失效的应然与实然层面正是这种限制后的结果。类型化便利于克服一般性、抽象性过高和孤立化、特殊化的两个极端,可以使对个别和特殊现象的研究上升到一般和普遍的高度,因此法的失效研究可采用这一进路。法的失效有行为的失效、和解的失效、调解的失效和制裁的失效四种基本类型,其间存在着二元递进选择关系,这一类型化架构可为法的失效研究提供一个理论工具。The existence of the failure of law can be at different levels and with different meanings. Therefore, it is necessary to set relative restrictions to draw a relative definitive conclusion, which leads to the result of ＂ as it is＂ and ＂ as it ought to be＂ of the failure of law with such restrictions. Typology can overcome the two extremes of grossly exorbitant generality and specialization. Individuality and specialization can be raised to the level of the generality and universality, which can be used for a study of the failure of law. There are four basic types of the failure law--failure of behavior, the failure of reconciliation, the failure of mediation and the failure of sanctions, among which exists a progressive choice of binary relations. This can provide a theoretical framework for the research of the failure of law.

关 键 词：法的失效 应然层面 实然层面 类型化 

分 类 号：D921[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]