检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:傅景亮[1]
出 处:《东南亚研究》2009年第4期27-32,共6页Southeast Asian Studies
摘 要:庇护主义在东南亚由来已久,传统的庇护主义渗入到威权体制的资本政治形态中,资本政治形态则赋予了庇护主义以新的内涵与发展。一方面这是由威权体制本身的性质所决定的,另一方面则是基于资本政治的建设。不同威权体制下资本政治的庇护主义模式存在差异性,如泰国是一种兼具合作与掠夺的混合型模式,而菲律宾则是私利取向的掠夺型模式。威权体制与资本政治形态的变迁动摇了庇护主义的存在基础,庇护主义的发展直接影响到威权体制的民主转型。In Southeast Asia, the patron-client is of long standing. The traditional patron-client penetrated into the capital politics, and the capital politics endows patron-client with new connotation. On the one hand, the nature of authoritarian regime in Southeast Asia needs the patron-client; on the other hand, this is decided by the building of capital politics. The patron-client model of capital politics differs in different authoritarian regime. For example, the patron-client in Thailand differs from the Philippines'. The change of authoritarian regime and capital politics' form wavers the foundation of the patron-client in Southeast Asia, and the development of patron-client pushs forward the democratization of Southeast Asia.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222