检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]黑龙江省科学院石油化学研究院,黑龙江哈尔滨150040
出 处:《化学与粘合》2009年第5期77-78,共2页Chemistry and Adhesion
摘 要:对比了GB/T7122-1996高强度胶黏剂剥离强度的浮辊法测定与ASTMD3167-03a胶黏剂浮辊剥离强度的标准试验方法,从几个方面分析了两种试验方法的差别以及对试验结果的影响,并由此得出同种胶黏剂分别采用以上方法试验得出的数据会有一定差异的结论,在对胶黏剂进行浮辊剥离强度复验时应当采用该胶黏剂出厂检验所采用的检测方法。Two methods were compared which were used for testing peel strength, one was GB/T 7122-1996 adhesives-determination of peel resistance of high-strength adhesive by bonds-floating roller method and the other one was ASTM D 3167-03a standard test method for floating roller peel resistance of adhesives. The differences between the two methods and effects on test results were analyzed from several aspects. It is concluded that there should be some differences between the determination data of peel strength of adhesive tested by these two methods respectively. Therefore when retest the peel strength of adhesive, the method which the manufactures apply should be employed.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.200