检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王丹枫[1]
机构地区:[1]上海财经大学经济学院,200433
出 处:《上海经济研究》2009年第9期18-27,共10页Shanghai Journal of Economics
摘 要:本文采用2004年1月至2008年6月中国股票市场机构投资者的季度交易数据分析了机构交易与股票价格波动的相关关系。研究发现,机构投资者并非总是具有稳定股市的功能。机构交易对股价波动的影响随着投资者类型、股票市值和流动性水平、市场结构和环境的变化而变化。在"后股改"时代,市场将面临非流通股股本减持的巨大压力,政策制定部门应将机构与中小股东利益集合起来,针对不同市场情况机构买卖单产生的不同影响,制定公平有效的政策和监管机制。Using a quarterly transactions database of Chinese institutions from January 2004 to June 2008, we investigate the relation between institutional trading and price volatility. We find institutions did not always stabilize the shares market. The impact of institutions' trades on price volatility could be changed by the difference of the institutions ' types, the levels of stocks ' size and liquidity, the market structures and environments. So, after the restriction of nontradable shareholders from trading begin to relax, we should combine the institutional interests with the individuals together. Considering the different impacts caused by institutional buy and sell orders during different market conditions, we must set down the impartial and efficient policies to make the institutions stabilize the shares market.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.15.7.195