2种头皮针静脉穿刺方法的比较研究  

Comparative study of two scalp venipuncture methods

作　　者：李华娟[1] 侯丽红[1] 任向辉[1] 李静[1] 

机构地区：[1]山东省聊城市人民医院,252000

出　　处：《中国实用护理杂志（中旬版）》2009年第9期15-16,共2页Chinese Journal of Practical Nursing

摘　　要：目的寻找一种成功率高、患者疼痛较小的头皮针静脉穿刺方法。方法以快速平行直入法为对照组，快速垂直直入法为实验组，将400例患者随机分为对照组和实验组各200例，统计2种方法1次穿刺成功率，采用VAS视觉模拟评分法得出疼痛分值，并进行统计处理。结果对照组1次成功率91．5％，实验组1次成功率99．5％，VAS视觉模拟评分值均具有显著差异。结论头皮针静脉穿刺时采用快速垂直直入法优于采用快速平行直入法。Objective To seek a scalp venipuncture method with high success rate and less pain for patients. Methods Taking the rapid parallel straight method as the control group, and the rapid vertical straight method as the experimental group, 400 patients were randomly divided into the control group and the experimental group with 200 patients in each group. The success rate of two groups were counted, pain scores were got by VAS visual imitation assessment and the results undergoing statistical analysis. Results The success rate was 91.5% in the control group, and 99.5% in the experimental group. Distinguished significance existed in VAS visual imitation score. Conclusions The rapid vertical straight method is superior to rapid parallel straight method in scalp venipuncture.

关 键 词：头皮针 静脉穿刺 快速直入法 研究 

分 类 号：R472.9[医药卫生—护理学] R685[医药卫生—临床医学]