朱维铮与清代学术史研究  

Zhu Weizheng's View on the History of Academic Study of the Qing Dynasty

作　　者：武少民[1] 闫玉环 

机构地区：[1]东北师范大学历史文化学院,吉林长春130024 [2]长春老年大学,吉林长春130061

出　　处：《长春师范大学学报（人文社会科学版）》2009年第5期37-41,共5页Journal of Changchun Teachers Coliege

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学研究2008年度项目<多维视野中的20世纪清代学术史研究>(08JA770006)

摘　　要：朱维铮论乾嘉学术时,善于总结乾嘉汉学与西学的关系,并揭示乾嘉学者在学与政之间的矛盾心理。在对晚清学术论述中,朱维铮盛赞龚自珍和魏源理论创新的勇气,指出康有为与章太炎都是晚清学术史上的关键人物。朱维铮纵论20世纪清学史研究的历程,重点比较了章太炎与刘师培清学史研究的异同和梁启超与钱穆清学史研究的不同旨趣,还总结了周予同清学史研究的贡献。When talking about the academic of Qianjia, Zhu Weizheng was good at summarizing the connection of Chinese and Westem. Moreover, he opened out the ambivalent mentality of the Qianjia scholars on the learning and governance. In the academic discussion of Late Qing,Zhu Weizheng highly praised Gong Zizhen and Wei Yuan＇s courage to carry out theory innovation, and pointed out that Kang Youwei and Zhang Taiyan were both the important figures in the academic history of the Late Qing. When discussing the research course of the academic study of the Qing Dynasty in the 20th, Zhu Weizheng focus on comparing Zhang Taiyan and Liu Shipei＇s Similarities and differences in the academic study of the Qing Dynasty, also the different interest of Liang Qichao and Qian Mu in the same study field. At the same time, he summarized Zhou Yutong＇ contribution in the academic study of the Qing Dynasty.

关 键 词：朱维铮 学术史 清代学者 清学史 

分 类 号：K092[历史地理—历史学]