不同洗手方法预防医院感染的作用  

Effect of Different Handwashing Methods on Preventing Nosocomial Infection in Hospital

作　　者：韦晓君[1] 石占利[1] 方堃[1] 李国辉[1] 李志会[1] 舒伟锋[1] 

机构地区：[1]浙江省中西医结合医院ICU,浙江杭州310003

出　　处：《中华医院感染学杂志》2009年第18期2455-2456,共2页Chinese Journal of Nosocomiology

摘　　要：目的观察不同洗手方法对预防医院感染的作用。方法50名医务人员在操作过程中分别采用3种方法洗手,全部人员操作完成后随机抽取40名,在其洗手前后分别取样并培养。结果洗手后,干洗法显示较为明显的优势,干洗法洗手合格率显著优于免洗法(P<0.05);其合格率达到95%,高于湿洗法的合格率(87.5%);干洗法菌落数(3.4±2.3)显著优于免洗法(10.7±7.2,P<0.01)和湿洗法(7.2±8.4,P<0.05)。结论干洗法对于预防医院感染具有较好的优势,在Ⅰ、Ⅱ类区域工作人员中具备较高的推广价值。OBJECTIVE To observe the effect of different handwashing methods to prevent nosocomial infection in hospital. METHODS Fifty medical staff adopted three handwashing methods respectively in the course of operation. When all operation was finished, forty personnel were picked out randomly for sampling and cultivation. RESULTS After handwahing, dry cleaning method had evident advantage. Compared with clean-free method, dry cleaning method was superior in qualified rate （P〈0.05）. The qualified rate of dry cleaning method was 95%, higher than that of wet cleaning method （87.5 %0）. On the part of bacterial colony count, dry cleaning method （3.4 ±2. 3） was predominant than clean-free method （10. 7±7.2, P〈0.01） and wet cleaning method （7.2±8. 4, P 〈0. 05）. CONCLUSIONS Dry cleaning method has evident advantage in preventing nosocomial infection in hospital,and deservs to popularize in the areas of I and 11 of the hospital.

关 键 词：洗手 医院感染 医务人员 

分 类 号：R187[医药卫生—流行病学]