临床使用中麻醉机安全性评价  

Primary the methods to evaluat the security of anesthesia machine during operation

作　　者：黄爱兰[1] 朱蔚琳[1] 秦岭[2] 莫志江[3] 马利[1] 黄雪梅[3] 

机构地区：[1]广西壮族自治区人民医院麻醉科,南宁530021 [2]广西壮族自治区人民医院科教部,南宁530021 [3]广西壮族自治区人民医院药剂科,南宁530021

出　　处：《陕西医学杂志》2009年第9期1197-1198,1244,共3页Shaanxi Medical Journal

基　　金：广西卫生厅自筹经费项目(Z2008082)

摘　　要：目的:应用临床麻醉中的监测指标以及术后恢复情况评价麻醉机安全性,探讨评价麻醉机安全性的方法。方法:选择106例全麻病人随机分为实验组(使用需评价麻醉机)和对照组(使用Drager Fabius麻醉机),比较两组生命体征、通气合格率以及术后并发症等指标综合评价。结果:两组病人生命体征正常,两组各时点比较无显著性差异(P>0.05);两组的通气合格率分别为94.34%和98.11%,两组比较无显著性差异(P>0.05)。术后两组病人未发现与麻醉机有关严重并发症。结论:需评价麻醉机在安全性方面与Drager Fabius麻醉机无显著性差异。Objective： To evaluat the security of anesthesia machine by using multiple clinical parameters. Methods： 106 patients were randomly divided into the experimental group （using testing anesthesia machine） and the control group （using Drager Fabius anesthesia machine）. Wrote down two groups of lives draft. Computed and compared two group＇s mechanical ventilation eligible rate. Compared the changes of inspiratory parameters, as well as the incidence of pneumonic complication. Results：Two groups of lives draft normally, compared with does not have the difference （P〉0.05）; Two group＇s mechanical ventilation eligible rate were 94.34% vs 98.11%. There was no significant difference（P〉0. 05）;There was no severe complication during anesthesia. Conclusion： The testing anesthesia machine is the same safe features compared with Drager Fabius.

关 键 词：麻醉 设备安全性 评价研究 

分 类 号：R285.1[医药卫生—中药学] R614[医药卫生—中医学]