检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:黄小玲[1] 盘顺平[1] 王春菊[1] 覃浩玲[1]
机构地区:[1]中山大学附属第一医院黄埔院区放射科,广东广州510700
出 处:《现代临床护理》2009年第9期35-36,6,共3页Modern Clinical Nursing
摘 要:目的探讨两类对比剂在CT增强扫描中不良反应的观察及护理方法。方法回顾性分析和总结3819例患者在行CT增强扫描中出现的不良反应和护理经验。结果离子型对比剂发生轻度不良反应为31.1%,中度不良反应为16.0%,重度不良反应为0.3%;非离子型对比剂发生轻度不良反应为4.0%,中度不良反应为0.3%,重度不良反应为0,两组不良反应比较,经统计学分析,Z=20.52,P<0.05,差异具有统计学意义。结论非离子型对比剂在应用中副反应明显低于离子型对比剂。做好心理护理、检查前准备和不良反应的观察和护理,对保证CT增强扫描的顺利进行具有重要的意义。Objective To observe the side effects of two kinds of contrast medium in CT enhancement scanning. Method The side effects that appeared in 3 819 patients when they underwent CT enhancement scanning and the nursing experience were retrospectively analyzed and summarized. Results When ion contras.t medium was used, mild side effects occurred in 31.1% of patients, moderate side effects occurred in 16.0% of patients, and severe side effects occurred in 0.3% of patients. When non-ion contrast medium was used, mild side effects occurred in 4.0% of patients, moderate side effects occurred in 0.3% of patients,and no severe side effects occurred. There was significant difference between the two groups of side effects (P 〈 0.05). Conclusions There were remarkably fewer side effects when non-ion contrast medium was used. Psychological nursing, preparation before the scanning, observation of side effects and nursing are of great significance to the success of CT enhancement scanning.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249