检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:安健[1] 李保[1] 杨滨[1] 王敬萍[1] 张悟堂[1] 王仲朝[1] 王慧仙[1] 芦丽芳[1] 高勇莉[1]
机构地区:[1]山西省心血管疾病医院心内科,太原030024
出 处:《中国药物与临床》2009年第9期806-807,共2页Chinese Remedies & Clinics
基 金:山西省卫生厅科技攻关计划项目(041081)
摘 要:目的观察Partner药物洗脱支架在急诊经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)中的临床疗效。方法选择行急诊PCI的患者68例,分为Partner支架组和Cypher支架组,比较PCI术后即刻最小管腔直径,术后6个月复查冠状动脉造影,比较两组患者的再狭窄率。结果Partner支架组术后即刻最小管腔直径为(3.1±0.8)mm,Cypher支架组为(3.1±0.3)mm,两组相比差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);6个月冠状动脉造影显示再狭窄率Partner支架组为4%,Cypher支架组为3%,两组相比差异无统计学意义。结论在急诊PCI中,应用Partner药物洗脱支架安全有效。Objective To investigate the short-term outcomes of Partner drug-eluting stents in patients who were referred for emergent percutaneous coronary intervention. Methods Among 68 patients referred for emergent percutaneous coronary intervention, thirty-six were implanted with Partner stents and 32 with Cypher stents. Minimum lumen diameter (MLD) immediately after procedure and rates of re-stenosis at follow-up coronary angiography after 6 months were compared between the two cohorts. Results There were no statistical differences between the two cohorts in terms of MLD [(3.1±0.8)mm in Partner group vs (3.1±0.3)mm in Cypher group, P〉0.05 ] and rates of restenosis (4% in Partner group vs 3% in Cypher group, P〉0.05). Conclusion Partner drug-eluting stents appeared safe and effective for use in emergent PCI.
分 类 号:R541.4[医药卫生—心血管疾病]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.68