检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《实用心电学杂志》2009年第4期255-256,共2页Journal of Practical Electrocardiology
摘 要:目的探讨心前区不适患儿常规及动态心电图(DCG)改变的差异。方法对有心前区不适前来就诊的患儿,在作常规12导联同步心电图的同时,加作24h12导联DCG,进行对比分析。结果DCG与常规心电图各种心律失常及ST-T异常的阳性率分别为68.8%及14.1%,两者具有非常显著性差异(X2=9.28,P<0.01)。两种检查结果显示异常的患儿中心肌酶学异常者占30%。结论DCG是心前区不适患儿有效的检测方法。Objective Explore the difference between routine ECG and dynamic electrocardiogram in children with preeordial distress. Methods 12 - lead ECG and 24 - hour 12 - lead dynamic electrocardiogram were done simultaneously in the children presented with preeordial distress. The results were compared. Results Positive rate of various arrhythmias and abnormal ST - T segment detected by dynamic electrocardiogram and routine ECG were 68.8% and 14. 1% respectively( P 〈 0.01 ). 30% patients with abnormal ratine ECG and dynamic electrocardiogram got abnormal myocardial enzyme. Conclusion Dynamic Electrocardiography was an effective way to detect children with precordial distress.
分 类 号:R540.41[医药卫生—心血管疾病]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15