检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张晏[1]
机构地区:[1]北京大学法学院,北京100871
出 处:《中国地质大学学报(社会科学版)》2009年第5期22-27,共6页Journal of China University of Geosciences(Social Sciences Edition)
基 金:国家社会科学基金"十一五"规划重点项目(06AFX005)
摘 要:即使限于传统法框架,且有明确的法律依据,环境纠纷也很难进入诉讼程序;即使进入诉讼程序,也很难获得公正救济。这与司法独立缺位、司法能力不足以及司法定位局限有关。在对司法机关突破束缚寄予更高期待的同时,维护法律尊严、坚守正义防线是更为现实的选择。Even within the traditional legal framework and with explicit legal basis, people cannot resort to judicial procedure to solve environmental disputes. Moreover, even if an environmental dispute has been brought into litigation procedure, yet people cannot get fair remedies. The phenomenon has much to do with the vacancy of judicial independence, the insufficiency of judicial ability and the limitation of judicial role. When people expect the judicial branch to break up the shackles of old convention, maintaining the legal dignity and keeping to the final defense line of justice may be more practicable.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15