检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]华南理工大学工商管理学院,新型工业化发展研究所,广东广州510640
出 处:《经济管理》2009年第9期123-128,共6页Business and Management Journal ( BMJ )
基 金:广东省自然科学基金项目“基于行为的公司资本投资决策方法研究”(9451064101003435)
摘 要:针对我国上市公司财务困境预警模型研究中在指标、预警时点及模型选择方面的不足,本文从影响公司财务困境的各个方面分析并选择构建模型所需指标,选取2005~2009年120家被ST公司和240家财务正常公司为统计样本,运用逐步判别分析法基于2002~2009年的信息构建Z模型并进行比较分析。研究表明:Z模型与传统指标所构建的模型相比,本文构建的模型的判别正确率更高;根据我国上市公司股价的变化,应该选择t—3年作为预警时点并采用基于t—3年数据构建的模型;用另外的样本(96家)检验的结果发现,针对财务困境组,距困境发生的3年前该模型的判别正确率是81.25%。For limitations in financial ratio selection, discriminant time point definition and exact model confirmation with studies of financial distress prediction in China, we make an in--depth analysis of financial ratios, then pick up 120 ST firms and their matched 240 non--distressed firms through 2005--2009 as the sample, use stepwise discriminate analysis to establish Z--score models based on information from 2002--2008. Conclusions are: (1)Compared with the model constructed by traditional financial ratios, the discriminate accuracy is higher with the model constructed by us. (2) With studying movements of the stock price between ST firms and non--distressed firms, we confirm the discriminant time point should be t--3, and the discriminant model should be constructed by data in t--3. (3)With another sample(96 firms) that is not for model establishment to test the model's predictive power, to the financial distressed firms, when we make a discrimination three years before being distressed, the accuracy is 81.25%, thus it's a Well discriminator for distinguishing distressed firms three years ahead.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.62