法律判断如何证成?——“阿列克西难题”及其解决  

How to Justify a Legal Judgment:On "Alexy ’s problem" and Its Solution

作　　者：陈锐[1] 

机构地区：[1]西南政法大学行政法学院

出　　处：《山东大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2009年第5期84-91,共8页Journal of Shandong University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)

基　　金：重庆市哲学社会科学规划项目"法律实证主义在中国"(项目批准号:2008-NFX04)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：法律判断如何证成?法学家们进行了多种尝试,其中的主要进路有:价值论进路、事实进路、逻辑进路、诉诸听众的进路、理想的言谈环境进路以及阿列克西的综合进路。但这些进路都分别存在着一些问题。那么,是什么使得法律判断得以证成的呢?如维特根斯坦所说的,法律不过是"语言游戏"之一种,其正当性存在于一定社会的"生活形式"之中,亦即实践之中。因此,我们只能从风俗、习惯、制度和传统等因素之中去寻找法律判断的正当性根据。How to justify a legal judgment？ Legal experts have tried various routs to find an answer for the question, including the value route, factual route, logical route, appealing-to-audience route, ideal talking-situation route and Alexy＇s integrative route. All these routes are prone to limitations and have failed to solve Alexy＇s problem thoroughly. Then, what can justify a legal judgment？ As Wittgenstein put it, the law is no more than a kind of language games, the justification for which consists in the ＂life form＂ of a society, namely, in the practice. It follows that we should search for the basis of the justification of a legal judgment from the customs, habits, institutions and traditions of a society.

关 键 词：法律判断 证成 阿列克西难题 语言游戏 实践 

分 类 号：D90[政治法律—法学理论]