机构地区:[1]右江民族医学院附属医院儿科,广西百色533000 [2]巴马县人民医院儿科,广西巴马547500
出 处:《实用儿科临床杂志》2009年第17期1317-1319,1324,共4页Journal of Applied Clinical Pediatrics
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目资助(30460137);广西自然科学基金项目资助(桂科自0229061);广西科学研究与技术开发计划项目资助(桂科基0141025);广西青年科学基金项目资助(桂科青0542071);广西卫生厅科研基金项目资助(9955)
摘 要:目的探讨大剂量环磷酰胺(CTX)冲击治疗壮族儿童难治性肾病综合征(RNS)的疗效及远期对性腺的损害。方法采用前瞻性随机方法,通过查随机数字表法将患儿分为CTX连续冲击治疗组(A组)和CTX非连续冲击治疗组(B组)。A组予CTX8~12 mg/(kg.次)加入9 g/L盐水100 mL静脉滴注1~2 h,1次/d,连用8~10次,累积量<120 mg/kg,同时予泼尼松2 mg/(kg.d)口服,尿蛋白转阴4周后,泼尼松改为2 mg/(kg.d),隔日早餐后顿服,连用4周后,每2~4周减量2.5~5.0 mg,总疗程4~6个月。B组予CTX8~12 mg/(kg.次)加入9 g/L盐水100 mL静脉滴注1~2 h,1次/d,连用2 d为1个周期,每4周应用1个周期,连用6~8个周期为1个疗程,累积量<200 mg/kg,泼尼松用法同A组。随访3~17 a。结果1.A组临床治愈率(CCR)为73.60%,完全缓解(CR)率为18.42%,部分缓解(PR)率为5.26%;B组CCR为53.66%,CR率为21.95%,PR率为19.51%,2组临床疗效比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。2.A组冲击治疗1 a后血浆Alb提高和24 h尿蛋白降低较B组快,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.01),2~3 a血浆Alb仍然较B组高,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01),24 h尿蛋白比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。3.二组医疗费用比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。4.二组疗效与其临床分类比较差异均无统计学意义(Pa>0.05),A组不同病理类型间疗效比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),B组不同病理类型间疗效比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.01),2组近期不良反应比较差异均无统计学意义(Pa>0.05),远期随访结果比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论2种CTX冲击联合泼尼松治疗方法均对壮族儿童RNS有较好疗效,CTX连续冲击治疗较CTX非连续冲击治疗可更快提高血浆Alb水平,使尿蛋白转阴更快,提高CCR,医疗费用低,CTX冲击治疗累积总量<80~200 mg/kg,近期安全,远期未发现性腺损害。Objective To explore the effects of high - dose cyclophosphamide (CTX) stosstherapy on refractory nephrotic syndrome (RNS) and long - term damage to gonad among Zhuang children. Methods The cases were divided into 2 groups, namely continuous CTX - stosstherapy group( group A) receiving CTX (8 -12 mg/kg, iv, once a day for 8 -10 days with 〈 120 mg/kg- accumulated dose) and prednisone (2 mg/kg orally once a day till urine protein analysis with negative results following 2 mg/kg orally once per two days on weeks 4, subsequently 2 mg/kg with 2.5 - 5.0 mg decrement orally every 2 - 4 weeks, 4 - 6 months - accumulated course of treatment) therapy and non - continuous CTX - stosstherapy group ( group B ) receiving CTX ( 8 - 12 mg/kg, iv, once a day for 2 days, every 4 weeks with 〈 200 mg/kg - accumulated dose) and aforementioned prednisone therapy by means of randomized method. Follow up lasted for 3 - 17 years. Results 1. Therapeutic effects of group A with 73.60% clinic - cure rate (CCR) , 18.42% complete remission(CR) ,and 5.26% partial remission(PR) were better than those in group B( CCR,CR and PR were 53.66% ,21.95% and 5.26% ,respectively) ,which had significant difference (P 〈 0.05 ). 2. The cases from group A showed more plasma Alb in 1 -3 years after treatment, compared with those from group B ( P 〈 0.01 ). The number of 24 h urine protein in 1 year after treatment in group A was less than that in group B ( P 〈 0.05 ) ; however, there was no significant difference of the number of 24 h urine protein in 2 years and 3 years after treatment between 2 groups( P 〉 0.05 ). 3. Additionally, there was significant difference for medical expenses ( P 〈 0.01 ). 4. Moreover, therapeutic effects of group A were not associated with clinical or pathological types of RNS ( P 〉 0.05 ) ; while therapeutic effects of group B were related to pathological types of RNS ( P 〈 0.01 ), but not to clinical types of RNS ( Pa 〉 0.05 ). There wa
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...