检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:高雪梅[1,2] 黎庶[1,2] 马述盛 张景荣[1,2] 张振华
机构地区:[1]河南医科大学一附院放射科 [2]中国医科大学第一临床学院放射科
出 处:《临床放射学杂志》1998年第5期284-287,共4页Journal of Clinical Radiology
摘 要:目的:探讨MRC对高、低位胆道梗阻的诊断价值和限度。材料与方法:分析30例胆道梗阻患者和5例健康自愿者MRC和常规MRI表现。结果:30例定位诊断均准确,其中高位梗阻10例,低位梗阻20例。高位梗阻MRC能显示狭窄范围,但梗阻端形态缺乏特征性;常规MRI显示恶性肿物者6/9例。低位梗阻MRC显示的近端形态具有特征性,良性者呈腔内圆形、柱状无信号区或移行性狭窄;恶性者表现为双管截断征和不规则狭窄;常规MRI显示恶性肿物8/11例。结论:MRC定位诊断准确,对低位梗阻可作出定性诊断;但高位梗阻形态缺乏特征性,其定性诊断需结合常规MRI。Objective: To explore the diagnosis value and limitation of MR cholangiography (MRC) for high and low level biliary obstruction.Materials and Methods:The features of MRC and conventional MRI were analyzed in 30 patients with biliary obstruction and 5 healthy volunteer.Results:The biliary obstruction was accurately located with MRC in 10 patients with high level biliary obstruction and 20 patients with low level biliary stenosis. In high level biliary obstruction, the range of obstruction was visualized, but the shape of the obstrution had no feature. Tumors were depicted with conventional MRI in 6 of 9 patients with malignacy. In low level biliary obstruction, the morphology proximal to the obstruction was characteristic with intraluminal round or pillar type signal void or gradual stenosis in benign obstruction, and amputation sign of “double ducts” and irregular stenosis in malignant obstruction. Conventional MRI demonstrated tumors in 8 of 11 patients with malignant tumors.Conclusion: MRC could accurately visualized the location of biliary obstruction, and could diagnose qualitatively for low level biliary obstruction to fixed location of high level biliary obstruction should combine with conventional MRI.
分 类 号:R657.430.4[医药卫生—外科学] R445.2[医药卫生—临床医学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3