检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘颖[1]
出 处:《四川大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2009年第5期134-139,共6页Journal of Sichuan University:Philosophy and Social Science Edition
摘 要:ADR作为一种非诉讼纠纷解决机制,具有低成本、高效率、灵活性、易执行的特点,与诉讼方式并行不悖。在我国经济转型时期,ADR机制有助于实现和谐的市场经济秩序,与经济法纠纷的复合性、新型性、技术性等特征契合,弥补了司法诉讼途径解决经济纠纷的不足,对于完善经济法纠纷解决机制具有重大意义。实践中,仍需解决ADR机制在经济法纠纷解决中的有效性和规范化问题,实现与国家司法权的协调互动。As one of the realistic solutions to economic law dispute, ADR has many advantages such as low cost , high efficiency , flexibility and easy execution, paralleling with economic lawsuit. In the transformation period of China, ADR has achieved the economic law connotation of harmonious society, minimized the defects of economic lawsuit and corresponded to the features of compound, new type, and technicality quality. ADR has important value to the perfection of the dispute resolution mechanism of economic law. The problem of legal validity and formalization of ADR must be solved to realize the coordination and interaction with the judicial authority.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15