新农村建设中“民宅自建”与“民宅统建”的对比分析  

Comparing Individual and Collective Housing Construction Models in New Socialist Rural Construction

作　　者：李建军[1] 户媛[1] 马雪莲[1] 郭晓莹[1] 苏喆丰[1] 石艳[1] 

机构地区：[1]广州大学建筑与城市规划学院

出　　处：《规划师》2009年第B09期82-85,共4页Planners

摘　　要：在社会主义新农村建设中,村民住宅建设问题引起极大关注。其中"民宅统建"和"民宅自建"这两种建设模式更是争论的焦点。对两者对比分析后发现,两者各有利弊。"民宅统建"符合当前统一建设的需要,但忽视了村民的自主性和创造性,容易造成当地建筑特色和神韵的缺失;"民宅自建"更符合村民意愿,能培育和延续村庄特色,为远期新农村建设奠定基础,但容易造成整体景观的凌乱。因此,如果能建立合理有度的村庄建设管理机制,以保护和引导民宅建设适度规范发展,就能更好地促进社会主义新农村建设。he construction of new housing in rural areas draws much social attention and debate about the individual and collective housing models. In the individual construction model the style of each new house is determined by its owner. This model allows for the continuation of village architectural character but may result in general architectural chaos. The collective construction model coordinates the integration of the styles of new housing but also eliminates the individuality and creativity of the homeowner. Appropriate regulations and guidance can promote improved new rural housing construction.

关 键 词：社会主义新农村 村庄规划 民宅自建 民宅统建 

分 类 号：TU987.29[建筑科学—城市规划与设计]