我国刑事没收的宪法学透视  

On Constitutional Views of Our Country's Confiscation Penalty

作　　者：欧爱民[1] 

机构地区：[1]湘潭大学法学院,湖南湘潭411105

出　　处：《湘潭大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2009年第5期36-41,共6页Journal of Xiangtan University:Philosophy And Social Sciences

基　　金：国家社科基金项目<中国宪法事例分析的类型化研究>(09BFX016)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：我国现行《刑法》所规定的没收财产有一般没收和特别没收两种类型。一般没收被纳入刑罚体系,而特别没收则被视为一种非刑罚处罚措施。就宪法学的角度而言,上述规定违背了法律明确性原则、比例原则、正当程序原则、平等保护原则等诸多宪法原则。对一般没收财产刑,由于其缺乏存在的正当性依据,应予以取消;对特别没收,应将之纳入刑罚体系,并明确其实体规定,建构其正当程序。Our country＇s penalty of confiscation of property includes common confiscation and special confiscation. In the view of constitution, the clauses violate several constitutional principles such as the legal definition principle, the proportion principle, the due process principle as well as the equal protection principle. Short of legilafimey of existence, common confiscation should be abolished. At the same time, we should integrate special confiscation into penalty system, define its entity standard, and construct its due process.

关 键 词：一般没收 特别没收 宪法原则 

分 类 号：D914[政治法律—刑法学] D911[政治法律—法学]