检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:万志鹏[1]
出 处:《湘潭大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2009年第5期42-46,共5页Journal of Xiangtan University:Philosophy And Social Sciences
基 金:湖南省哲学社会科学基金项目"没收财产刑研究"(08YBB069);暨湘潭大学人文社会科学研究基地开放课题"没收财产刑演变的基本规律"(08fx06065)阶段性成果。
摘 要:没收财产刑在我国刑法中一直被作为重刑对待。但在司法实践中,没收财产刑几乎成为变相的罚金,同时面临难以执行的困境,严重影响了其刑罚机能的发挥。从短期来看,应立即完善没收财产刑的执行配套措施,出台相应司法解释或者部门规章;从长远来看,立法上不宜再保留没收财产这种过于严厉的重刑,予以彻底废除是摆脱困境的最终出路。Forfeiture of property has been treated as a heavy punishment in China's criminal law. However, forfeiture of property has nearly become to another kind of fine in judicial practice. Even so, the execution is very difficult now, that affects the function of punishment seriously. In the short term, we should improve the measures of execution by promulgating judicial interpretations or administrative regulations. In the long run, the forfeiture of property is so harsh that the legislature should not retain it in criminal code. In order to solve its difficulty, the final way is to be abolished completely.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.15.149.213